Timberlake Watershed Improvement District (WID)
The Robert E. Lee Soil &
Water Conservation District support the Timberlake WID. This WID was established
to work with homeowners above the lake and make them aware of their roles
in protecting water quality. The District sees this WID as a model for other watershed
improvement districts.
(Code
of Virginia
10.1-614)
WID 2009 Annual Report
Water Quality:
Continuing the working
relationship with Professor Tom
Shahady and his Lynchburg College environmental group, a full water quality
testing program is beginning. This will include both inlet water and composite
water testing as well as bimonthly e.coli testing. This program is
designed to delineate the important sources of contamination, the precursor to
quality control.
Dredging:
Timberlake is fed by
three watershed coves. Brown’s Cove and Buffalo Creek Cove were dredged during
the previous calendar year using volunteer labor and the $20,000 given to the
Timberlake Watershed Improvement District (WID). The contribution was given by
the builders of the Braxton Park housing development, which is located at the
headwaters of the Waterlick cove. Waterlick Creek had been previously tested by
a Lynchburg College environmental team and declared one of the most pristine
streams in the region. Plans are underway for silt removal from the check dam at
Brown’s cove allowing it to continue its now proven silt collecting
effectiveness. In addition, Waterlick Cove, Timberlake’s undredged cove, will be
dredged when a silt dumping location is found.

Canada Geese:
Two methods of goose
control have been in use with limited success. Egg oiling takes care of only
propagation from local nests but does nothing to disperse the parent
geese.Pyrotechnic chasing initially worked well, but in time as thegeese
apparently became accustomed to the bang and the flare, the geese moved but
didn’t leave. Consequently, during a recent molting season the goose removal
services of the US Fish and Wildlife Christiansburg office were purchased. The
Service brought their cage, easily herded the thirty-eight geese into the cage
and left (along with $1600). Whether there will be a serious problem with
locally transient geese after the molting season ends is to be seen.
Hydrilla and Niad:
The burgeoning
infestation of last year’s incursion of hydrilla andniad aquatic grasses did not
repeat in the Spring and Summer of 2009. It is hoped that the 1000 grass carp
that were stocked in 2008 are responsible for the difference. But this Spring’s
continual rains are also believed by some to be partially responsible, having
produced the mild turbidity, relative to last Summer’s unusual clarity, which
could be serving as a growth retardant for aquatic grasses.

Trustees of the WID
Tom McCraw
email:
tommac@jetbroadband.com
Craig Brewer
email:
cbrewer@jetbroadband.com